data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddd43/ddd43225239af5c135d4cd2f38d639e3571b3ee6" alt=""
I think Hugh Jackman proved, Sunday night, there's a case to be made against ironic detachment in an Academy Awards ceremony host. Not that I'd want to see a fan-wank every year, but as much as I have loved Jon Stewart & Co, Jackman's sincerity was a nice change of pace.
The staging changes - stealing the intimate look the Emmys adopted in the last couple years - were refreshing for most of the show, up until a point. Specifically, the point where I was past ready for bedtime (I can't imagine how East coasters deal with this) was the point where I'd had enough of the reality show-type nomination readings. Was someone going to get an award, or get booted off the island?
But we all know what really matters — the fashions!
There were two trends I noticed, both returnees from the past: deep blues on the comeback trail, and serious construction. RPI-worthy.
First the blues - few but very noticable.
There was someone else, too, who took it a step further with awful 1970s' blue eye makeup.
Then there were the super-constructed dresses.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
This is my tatt:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91ef4/91ef46f7a93cf5fc02f3d090f3c33cc97297d451" alt=""
And these are my
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0fcc/e0fcc8c98c4fdef21934bdab28497f5388d1d74b" alt=""
Oh, never mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment